Table of contents
Why “10x your income” is an incomplete shortcut
The popular rule of thumb — cover equal to 10-15x annual income — ignores two things that matter a lot: existing debts your family would have to repay, and future goals (children’s education, a spouse’s retirement) your income was funding. A proper calculation accounts for both.
The calculation method
| Step | Component | Amount (₹) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Annual income to replace × years until retirement (income replacement) | 1,80,00,000 |
| 2 | + Outstanding liabilities (home loan, car loan, personal loans) | 45,00,000 |
| 3 | + Future goals (children's education, marriage — present value) | 60,00,000 |
| 4 | − Existing life cover + liquid investments earmarked for this | (25,00,000) |
| 5 | Recommended cover | 2,60,00,000 |
Term vs endowment/ULIP: why term is usually the base layer
| Factor | Term insurance | Endowment / ULIP |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Pure risk cover | Risk cover + investment bundled |
| Cover-per-rupee-of-premium | High | Low (much of the premium funds the investment component) |
| Transparency | Simple to evaluate | Charges and returns often harder to disentangle |
| Best used for | Sizing adequate life cover cheaply | Generally better handled by separating insurance and investment |
Things that reduce your actual payout risk
- Buy early — premiums are locked lower the younger and healthier you are at purchase.
- Disclose accurately — non-disclosure of health history is the single biggest reason claims get rejected; it is never worth the premium saving.
- Choose insurer claim-settlement ratio and claim-settlement speed, not just the cheapest premium.
- Review cover every major life event — marriage, a child, a new home loan, a significant income change.
Bottom line
Calculate cover using income replacement + liabilities + future goals − existing assets, rather than a flat multiple of income. Term insurance should be the default base layer of a family’s financial safety net, kept separate from investment products.